The Logic of Imitative Processes: Imitation as Secondary Innovation – an Axiomatic Schumpeterian Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15678/AOC.2016.1503Keywords:
imitation, innovation, production system, axiomatic analysis, Schumpeterian approachAbstract
This paper offers an axiomatic analysis of the imitative activity of producers in a Schumpeterian process of innovative change. It argues that structural change in the economy is generated by leaders of radical innovation, whose actions trigger the diffusion of innovations, and whose strategies and innovations can be copied by imitators. As a consequence, these imitators become second-order innovators operating in a production system that is deprived of primary innovators. The paper demonstrates that increases in the number and variety of second-order innovators can intensify innovative changes throughout the production system. Furthermore, this logic can be reconstructed by reference to the research programme on modelling Schumpeterian innovative evolution within the Arrow-Debreu dynamic general equilibrium theory.
References
The Active Consumer: Novelty and Surprise in Consumer Choice (1998) ed. M. Bianchi. London–New York: Routledge.
Andersen, E. S. (2009) Schumpeter’s Evolutionary Economics. London: Anthem Press.
Bessen, J. and Maskin, E. (2009) “Sequential Innovation, Patents, and Imitation”. Journal of Economics 40 (4): 611–35, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2171.2009.00081.x.
Bolton, M. K. (1993) “Imitation versus Innovation. Lessons to be Learned from the Japanese”. Organizational Dynamics 21 (3): 30–45, https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616 (93)90069-d.
Ciałowicz, B. and Malawski, A. (2011) “The Role of Banks in the Schumpeterian Innovative Evolution – an Axiomatic Set-up” in A. Pyka, F. Derengowski, and M. da Graca (eds) Catching Up, Spillovers and Innovation Networks in a Schumpeterian Perspective. Heidelberg–Dordrecht–London–New York: Springer, pp. 31–58.
Ciałowicz, B. and Malawski, A. (2012) “The Role of Households in the Schumpeterian Innovative Evolution – an Axiomatic Set-up”. Paper to the 14th International Schumpeter Society Conference, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia, 2–5 July.
Ciałowicz, B. and Malawski, A. (2013) “Demand Driven Schumpeterian Innovative Evolution” in A. Malawski (ed.) Innovative Economy as the Object of Investigation in Theoretical Economics. Kraków: Cracow University of Economics Press.
Debreu, G. (1959) Theory of Value. New York: Viley.
Glass, A. J. (2010) Imitation as a Stepping Stone to Innovation. College Station: Department of Economics, Texas A&M University.
Hanusch, H. and Pyka, A. (2006) “Principles of Neo-Schumpeterian Economics”. Cambridge Journal of Economics 31 (2): 275–89, https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bel018.
Herrmann-Pillath, C. (2013) Foundations of Economic Evolution. Cheltenham, UK– Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
Innovative Economy as the Object of Investigation in Theoretical Economics (2013) ed. A. Malawski. Kraków: Cracow University of Economics Press.
Luo, Y., Sun, J. and Le Wung, S. (2011) “Emerging Economy Copycats”. Academy of Management Perspectives 25 (2): 37–56.
Malawski, A. (1999) Metoda aksjomatyczna w ekonomii [The axiomatic method in economics]. Wrocław: Ossolineum.
Malawski, A. and Woerter, M. (2006) “Diversity Structure of the Schumpeterian Evolution. An Axiomatic Approach”. Arbeitspapiere / Working Papers of the Swiss Institute for Business Cycle Research No. 153, October. Zürich: KOF.
Mukoyama, T. (2003) “Innovation, Imitation, and Growth with Cumulative Technology”. Journal of Monetary Economics 50 (2): 361–80, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3932(03) 00005-9.
Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Niosi, J. (2012) “Innovation and Development through Imitation (In Praise of Imitation)”. Presented to the meeting of the International Schumpeter Society, Brisbane, Australia, 2–5 July.
Safarzyńska, K. and van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2010) “Evolutionary Models in Economics: a Survey of Methods and Building Blocks”. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 20 (3): 329–73, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-009-0153-9.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1934) The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Segerstrom, P. S. (1990) Innovation, Imitation and Economic Growth. Econometrics and Economic Theory Paper No. 8818. East Lansing: Michigan State University.
Shenkar, O. (2010) “Defend Your Research: Imitation is More Valuable Than Innovation”. Harvard Business Review, April: 28–29.
