Trust Culture and the Ethics of Government: When Trust among Citizens Is Deficient
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15678/AOC.2014.1003Keywords:
ethics of honesty, trust, trust culture, trust managementAbstract
Citizens’ trust in government mostly derives from the “ethics” factor, critically and particularly its “honesty” aspect. Public service is a public trust. This article aims to study the level of trust that Thai people perceive in the ethics of government, to investigate barriers to trust, and to provide determinant indicators that can promote ethical government and trust culture in the public sphere. Both questionnaires and the interview schedule were synthesised from the relevant literature. Based on the collected data, the findings were as follows: (1) citizens’ perception of the ethics of honesty of the Yingluck government is at very low level; (2) citizens’ trust in the ethics of honesty of the Yingluck government was found to be at a very low level in three areas of trust perception – trustworthiness, basic trust, and trust culture; (3) the relationship between the ethics of the Thai government and citizens’ trust were positively correlated in the same direction at a high level (r = 0.928); (4) there was a very high level (sig. 876) of inconsistency between the behaviours regarded as a test of the government’s honesty and those expected by citizens; (5) the major barriers to public trust in the Yingluck government derived from unethical norms and behaviours, a culture of distrust, political intervention in the bureaucracy, an unethical leader or a puppet leader (former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra – Yingluck’s elder brother), mega-project corruption, autocratic rule, and illegal policies – the amnesty bill; (6) alignments to cultivate trust culture include incorruptibility, public interest and the upholding of justice, transparency and accountability, respect for diversity and for the worth and dignity of people, and commitment to excellence and to maintaining the public trust.The article postulates sufficient evidence to conclude that citizens’ trust in the ethics of the Thai government is at a very low level. It highlights where existing measures match the theory, but it also identifies a number of dimensions for which “trust deficiency” or “distrusted” was recorded. This was especially the case with regard to the content of the trust belief correlated with the ethics of honesty and to the selection of possible alignments for contributing to trust culture among Thai citizens.
References
Bjerke, B. (1999) Business Leadership and Culture: National Management Styles in the Global Economy. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Cardona, P. and Morley, M. J. (2012) Manager-subordinate Trust: A Global Perspective (Global HRM). New York: Routledge.
Covey, S. (2006) The Speed of Trust. New York: Free Press.
Dietz, G. and Hartog, D. N. (2006) “Measuring Trust Inside Organizations”. Personnel Review 35: 557–88, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00483480610682299.
Fukuyama, F. (1995) Trust: The Social Virtues & The Creation of Prosperity. New York: The Free Press.
Gambetta, D. (1988) “Can We Trust?” in Diego Gambetta (ed.) Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Howell, D. C. (2007) Statistical Methods for Psychology. Sixth edition. Belmont, CA: Thomson-Wadsworth.
Inglehart, R. (1996) “Trust, Well-being and Democracy”. Paper to the “Trust and Democracy” conference, Georgetown University, 7–9 November.
Lewis, C. W. and Catron, B. L. (1996) “Professional Standards and Ethics” in J. L. Perry (ed.) Handbook of Public Administration. Second edition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Lewis, C. W. and Gilman, S. C. (2005). The Ethics Challenge in Public Service. Second edition. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
McAllister, D. J. (1995) “Affect- and Cognition-based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organisations”. Academy of Management Journal 38 (1): 24–59, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256727.
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H. and Schoorman, F. D. (1995) “An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust”. Academy of Management Review 20: 709–34, http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335.
Newton, K. (2001) “Trust, Social Capital, Civil Society and Democracy”. International Political Science Review 22 (2): 201–14, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0192512101222004.
OECD (2004) Building Public Trust: Ethics Measures in OECD Countries. Public Management Policy Brief No. 7. Paris: OECD, September, date of access: 14 March 2011.
OECD (2000) Trust in Government: Ethics Measures in OECD Countries. Paris: OECD, September, date of access: 14 March 2011.
Rose-Ackerman, S. (2001) “Trust, Honesty, and Corruption: Theories and Survey Evidence from Post-Socialist Societies”. Paper to the “Honesty and Trust in Post-Socialist Societies” workshop, Collegium Budapest, 25–26 May.
Six, F. E., De Bakker, F. G. A. and Huberts, L. W. J. C. (2007) “Judging a Corporate Leader’s Integrity: An Illustrated Three-component Model”. European Management Journal 25: 185–94, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2007.04.003.
Sztompka, P. (1999) Trust: A Sociological Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sztompka, P. (1996) “Trust and Emerging Democracy: Lessons from Poland”. International Sociology 11 (1): 37–62, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/026858096011001004.
Sztompka, P. (2007) Zaufanie [Trust]. Kraków: Znak.
Uslaner, E. M. (1999) “Democracy and Social Capital” in M. Warren (ed.) Democracy and Trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
