What Makes Technical Analysis Popular?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15678/AOC.2015.1205Keywords:
technical analysis, efficient market hypothesis, overconfidence, “better than average” effectAbstract
According to the Efficient Market Hypothesis, investors cannot achieve above-average returns by using technical analysis tools. This paper attempts to answer the question as to what makes technical analysis popular, regardless of the efficiency of capital markets. The objective is to verify whether investors have certain cognitive inclinations that make them more likely to believe in the efficiency of technical analysis models. We postulate a positive relationship between different forms of overconfidence and faith in the effectiveness of technical analysis methods. This relationship was confirmed only in the case of the “better than average” effect. The two other examined forms of overconfidence, namely, overprecision and illusion of control, did not yield statistically significant results. However, the lack of confirmation by all three forms of overconfidence is in line with the results presented in the literature, namely, that there are no significant relationships between different forms of overconfidence.References
Alexander, S. S. (1961) “Price Movements in Speculative Markets: Trends or Random Walk”. Industrial Management Review 2(2): 7–26.
Barberis, N., Schleifer, A. and Vishny, R. (1988) “A Model of Investor Sentiment”. Journal of Financial Economics 49(3): 307–43.
Charlebois, M. and Sapp, S. (2007) “Temporal Patterns in Foreign Exchange Returns and Options”. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 39(2/3): 443–70, http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/j.0022-2879.2007.00032.x.
Daniel, K. D., Hirschleifer, D. and Subrahmanyam, A. (2001) “Overconfidence, Arbitrage, and Equilibrium Asset Pricing”. Journal of Finance 56(3): 921–65, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00350.
Fama, E. F. (1970) “Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work”. Journal of Finance 25(2): 383–417, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2325486.
Fama, E. F. and Blume, M. E. (1966) “Filter Rules and Stock-Market Trading”. Journal of Business 39(1) (Part 2: Supplement on Security Pricing): 226–41, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/294849.
Field, A. P. (2005) Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. Second edition. London: Sage.
Grossman, S. J. and Stiglitz, J. E. (1980) “On the Impossibility of Informationally Efficient Markets”. American Economic Review 70(3): 393–403.
Kubińska, E. and Markiewicz, Ł. (2013) “Wpływ nadmiernej pewności siebie na ryzyko portfela inwestycyjnego” [The impact of overconfidence on investment portfolio risk] in A. S. Barczak and P. Tworek (eds) Zastosowanie metod ilościowych w zarządzaniu ryzykiem w działalności inwestycyjnej [The use of quantitative methods in risk management in investment activities]. Katowice: Katowice University of Economics.
Langer, E. J. (1975) “The Illusion of Control”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32(2): 311–28.
Lichtenstein, S., Fischhoff, B. and Phillips, L. D. (1982) “Calibration of Subjective Probabilities: The State of the Art up to 1980” in D. Kahneman, P. Slovic and A. Tversky (eds) Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lo, A. (2004) “The Adaptive Market Hypothesis: Market Efficiency from an Evolutionary Perspective”. Journal of Portfolio Management 30(5): 15–29.
Malkiel, B. G. (2003) “The Efficient Market Hypothesis and its Critics”. Journal of Economic Perspectives 17: 59–82, http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/089533003321164958.
Markiewicz, Ł. and Weber, E. U. (2013) “DOSPERT’s Gambling Risk-taking Propensity Scale Predicts Excessive Stock Trading. Journal of Behavioral Finance 14(1): 65–78, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15427560.2013.762000.
Menkhoff, L. and Taylor, M. P. (2007) “The Obstinate Passion of Foreign Exchange Professionals: Technical Analysis. Journal of Economic Literature 45(4): 936–72, http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jel.45.4.936.
Moore, D. A. (2007) “Not So above Average after All: When People Believe They Are Worse than Average and Its Implications for Theories of Bias in Social Comparison”. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 102(1): 42–58, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.09.005.
Moore, D. A. and Cain, D. M. (2007) “Overconfidence and Underconfidence: When and Why People Underestimate (and Overestimate) the Competition”. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 103(2): 197–213, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.09.002.
Moore, D. A. and Healy, P. J. (2008) “The Trouble with Overconfidence”. Psychological Review 115(2): 502–17, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.115.2.502.
Murphy, J. J. (1999) Technical Analysis of the Financial Markets: A Comprehensive Guide to Trading Methods and Applications. New York: New York Institute of Finance.
Schulmeister, S. (2009) “Aggregate Trading Behaviour of Technical Models and the Yen/Dollar Exchange Rate 1976–2007”. Japan and the World Economy 21(3): 270–79.
Svenson, O. (1981) “Are We All Less Risky and More Skillful than Our Fellow Drivers?”. Acta Psychologica 47(2): 143–148, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(81)90005-6.
Tetlock, P. E. (2002) “Cognitive Biases in Path-dependent Systems: Theory Driven Reasoning about Plausible Pasts and Probable Futures in World Politics” in T. Gilovich, D. W. Griffin and D. Kahneman (eds) Inferences, Heuristics and Biases: New Directions in Judgment under Uncertainty. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tyszka, T. and Zielonka, P. (2002) “Expert Judgments: Financial Analysis versus Weather Forecasters”. The Journal of Psychology and Financial Markets 3: 152–60, http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327760JPFM0303_3.
Zielonka, P. (2002) “How Financial Analysts Perceive Macroeconomic, Political News and Technical Analysis Signals”. Financial Counseling and Planning 13(1): 87–95.
Zielonka, P. (2004) “Technical Analysis as the Representation of Typical Cognitive Biases”. International Review of Financial Analysis 13: 217–25, http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.irfa.2004.02.007.
